The Federation of Government
Information Processing Councils (FGIPC) was formed in 1979 because it was
necessary. It was an early Social Network, before LinkedIn and all the others furnished
a way for professionals to forge connections and share information.
In the 1970’s, you could
count the number of computers owned by the government. Quite literally – Ken Allen
has a book in his office from the late Sixties than lists all 600 or so government
computers. Every computer tended to be a little bit different. You might have
the identical make and model as a system in another agency, but the parts would
be somewhat different, and the baseline software probably had a different level
of release and patches. But it was always advantageous to know someone who had
the same ostensible configuration – perhaps to consult on the costs and advantages
of installing new software or peripherals, or to help troubleshoot some balky
issue. A series of local associations of government ADPE - Automated Data
Processing Equipment – professionals sprang up in local areas and regions to
facilitate information sharing, and were generally across agencies within a
metropolitan area or region. The ADP Council of the Southeast, the Southern
California Technology Council, the New England ADP Council, and others,
totaling fifteen or twenty regional and a couple of vertical Councils.
The Federation – FGIPC –
was launched from a vision of extending the collegial sharing beyond regional
and onto a national basis. FGIPC provided an annual conference – the Management
of Change – and used its meager funds to support scholarships for federal IT
students. It was a shoestring operation, with no paid staff but intense support
from several motivated elected officers. It was actually subsidized by the home
agencies of those officers in time and travel. It had nominal support from OMB
and GSA. FGIPC provided a valuable forum for meeting technology managers beyond
the home agency or local region. In 2003, FGIPC elected to re-brand itself as
the American Council for Technology, and ACT as we know it presently was born.
While this is a pretty desiccated
recitation of yesteryear, it is consequential to comprehend why ACT was originated
and the value that it delivered in order to appreciate some of the later events
and some of the current challenges. In subsequent blogs, we will delve into
some of the less savory practices and events of FGIPC that represent lessons
for today.
No comments:
Post a Comment